xBrowse & SQLRDD

[elvira]

Lucas,

I am afraid xHarbour.com is a failed company. It does still offer a compiler compiled with Pelles, no 64 bits version, no support... It is mainly runned by Patrick Mast.

But what I want to share is that our company purchased SQLRDD a couple of years before. We had several issues and we did not get a reply from Patrick. We sent many many emails but not reply. We quit SQLRDD.

He is not a serious busssiness man. And, in some kind, the product is a scam. It is very evident in the experience shared by Lucas that he does not provide a working demo and he does not reply the mails too.

The best tip to do with SQLRDD from xHarbour.com and Patrick Mast is just ignore it. Very soon the site will close.

Opposite, we always get very good support from Fivetech with our FTDN.


My two cents.

[lucasdebeltran]

Hi,

With latest FWH 12.06, xBrowse does not work with SQLRDD.

Also, I edited source\xbrowse.prg and remote all calls to SQLRDD. It works better but not fine.

Mr. Rao, please can you look at this?.

Thank you.

[lucasdebeltran]

When I add a new record, the xbrowse displays the first record at the bottom of the browse and looks like there are 2 selected records. If I page up/page down, the browse resets and looks good. If i then move the mouse cursor outside of the browse, the browse corrupts again (first record at the bottom of the browse).

Thanks

[Blessed]

That's common, I was presented with the FWH 10.10, with small lists, getting better with larger number of items.
I have understood, that the 11.11 that was solved, buy it, but still not able to set to work.
And working with the same version of xHarbour (Sep 2010) in both distributions, the 11.11 do not walk.
Not say with later versions of xHarbour.
Do not know if anyone has done work on the 11.11, with xHarbour of September 2010 or the version of November, 2011.
It would be helpful

Eso es comun, se me presenta con la FWH 10.10, con listas pequeñas, va mejorando con mayor numero de items.
Tengo entendido, que en la 11.11 eso se soluciono, la compre, pero aun no la logro poner a trabajar.
Y trabajando con la misma version de xHarbour (Sep 2010) en ambas distribuciones, la 11.11 no anda.
Ni digamos con versiones posteriores de xHarbour.
No se si alguien ha hecho trabajar la 11.11, con xHarbour de Sep-2010 o bien la version de Noviembre-2011.
Seria de mucha ayuda

[nageswaragunupudi]

Can you please let me know what value OrdKeyNo() returns? Does this function return serial number of the row in the index order?

[PeterHarmes]

OrdKeyNo does not work in SQLRDD. Apparently, there is no way of knowing this (from xHarbour.com)

[nageswaragunupudi]

OrdKeyNo does not work in SQLRDD. Apparently, there is no way of knowing this (from xHarbour.com)

I am testing with sqlrdd demo version that I downloaded recently.
OrdKeyCount() is returning the number of records and appears to honor filters.

The function OrdKeyNo() also does exist. But it always returns 0.0 with the demo version.

I wanted to know the results from SQLRDD users who are using the latest regular version.

With the demo version I faced another problem. When I tried to read the dbf in a do while loop, the first few rows are repeated over and over and it never reached eof().

I thought it better to ascertain the correct functionality of the Ord**() functions from users of latest regular RDD.

[PeterHarmes]

I had to modify xBrowse to work with SQLRDD - I can send you my version if you like.

The only limitation I have is when you multi select records, you must be using an index where the key would be unique ( on a transaction number/record number for example)

xBrowse seems to work very well with these modifications

[lucasdebeltran]

Mr. Nages,

OrdKeyNo() does not exist in SQLRDD. It always returns 0, it is fine as their authors say.

[nageswaragunupudi]

I had to modify xBrowse to work with SQLRDD - I can send you my version if you like.

The only limitation I have is when you multi select records, you must be using an index where the key would be unique ( on a transaction number/record number for example)

xBrowse seems to work very well with these modifications

Thanks. Please send to nageswaragunupudi@gmail.com

[Blessed]

Hello Peter

I had to modify xBrowse to work with SQLRDD - I can send you my version if you like.

The only limitation I have is when you multi select records, you must be using an index where the key would be unique ( on a transaction number/record number for example)

xBrowse seems to work very well with these modifications

With that version of FW and xHarbour Work?
Could you send a copy to my email: _.mriv@gmail.com
Thanks in advance