I have used Borland 5.5.1 compiler for many years.
I noticed on the xHarbour.org website they have a version for Borland 5.8 compiler.
is there any benefit from the 5.8 over the 5.5.1 compiler?
Borland 5.8 compiler
- don lowenstein
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:09 pm
- Contact:
Borland 5.8 compiler
Don Lowenstein
www.laapc.com
www.laapc.com
- Enrico Maria Giordano
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Roma - Italia
- Contact:
Re: Borland 5.8 compiler
Nothing visible but it surely have many bug fixes. And, by the way, you have to use it with the new FWH releases.
EMG
EMG
Re: Borland 5.8 compiler
The visible difference maybe the linker (ilink32.exe).
In some (rare) cases, BCC 5.5's linker failed to link an application, complaining something like "access violation" .
BCC 5.8 has the "best" linker among 5.5 up to 6.2 because even the 6.2's version sometimes failed for no obvious reason.
In some (rare) cases, BCC 5.5's linker failed to link an application, complaining something like "access violation" .
BCC 5.8 has the "best" linker among 5.5 up to 6.2 because even the 6.2's version sometimes failed for no obvious reason.
Andi
Re: Borland 5.8 compiler
Latest info, it seems that BCC 6.3 which comes bundled with Embarcadero RAD Studio XE brings some improvement to the compiler. Inappropriate codes which compilable with the lower version and even compilable with MSVS 10, are now rejected by BCC 6.3.andijahja wrote:The visible difference maybe the linker (ilink32.exe).
In some (rare) cases, BCC 5.5's linker failed to link an application, complaining something like "access violation" .
BCC 5.8 has the "best" linker among 5.5 up to 6.2 because even the 6.2's version sometimes failed for no obvious reason.
Andi
- don lowenstein
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:09 pm
- Contact:
- Antonio Linares
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37481
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Spain
- Contact: