Incorrect "Group" definition

Post Reply
User avatar
Ross_ValuSoft
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:27 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Incorrect "Group" definition

Post by Ross_ValuSoft »

Hi Antonio,

I have wasted an hour today because the help entry for "Group" says ...
@ <nTop> . <nLeft> [ GROUP <oGroup> ] TO <nBottom>, <nRight> ;
I believe it should say ...
@ <nTop> . <nLeft> [ GROUP <oGroup> ] TO <nHeight>, <nWidth> ;
Am I correct?

Regards,

Ross
User avatar
johnshay
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:46 am
Location: Manchester,UK

Re: Incorrect "Group" definition

Post by johnshay »

Hi Ross,
I know this is a little late but you are right. Reading your comment made me realise what was happening with my code using this function. Thanks for Pointing it out, You have saved me a few hours !
User avatar
Antonio Linares
Site Admin
Posts: 37481
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Re: Incorrect "Group" definition

Post by Antonio Linares »

Here it is GROUP docs. It includes an example:

http://wiki.fivetechsoft.com/doku.php?i ... ands_group
regards, saludos

Antonio Linares
www.fivetechsoft.com
Post Reply