AT( ) Function. Harbour vs xHarbour
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2021 11:43 pm
I'm working with some legacy code orignially developed with xHarbour. The AT() function in xHarbour has this syntax:
At( <cSearch>, <cString>, [<nStart>], [<nEnd>] ) --> nPos
Using Harbour, AT() only supports the first two parameters and will error if the nStart is specified.
Is there an alternative syntax for Harbour that matches the original xHarbour ( and Clipper ) function syntax?
At( <cSearch>, <cString>, [<nStart>], [<nEnd>] ) --> nPos
Using Harbour, AT() only supports the first two parameters and will error if the nStart is specified.
Is there an alternative syntax for Harbour that matches the original xHarbour ( and Clipper ) function syntax?